| Picture
                this. A young girl with beautiful almond shaped eyes huddled up
                in a corner in one of those rooms in a boarding school, poring
                over pages of William Makepeace Thackeray’s, Vanity Fair.
                Fast forward and the same girl walks past the author’s
                bungalow in Calcutta and a few decades later – on 10th August
                2004 – with kohl outlined eyes she sits in front of a packed
                audience, in one of the rooms at the Landmark Midtown Theatre,
                poised to answer queries about her movie, Vanity Fair. The young
                girl is now director extraordinaire Mira Nair. The name is
                synonymous with movies like Mississippi Masala, Salaam Bombay,
                Hysterical Blindness and Monsoon Wedding among many others and
                Vanity Fair is just another feather to add to her repertoire.
                Attired in a blue blazer over a white salwaar kameez, Nair sits
                enthusiastically in front of an equally enthused crowd and
                offers her views on everything from the brilliantly etched
                characters in Thackeray’s novel to Empire necklines. 
 | 
            
              | On how she casts actors in her films…
 I do cast very intuitively and I’d like to be surprising.
                There’s no fun having a Miramax cast.
 
 On why Vanity Fair is such a favorite book and what she hopes
                audiences will have got from it…
 You know I grew up in India and like most of us colonial
                hangovers we think and read in English and English literature
                was a big thing to me and I studied Shakespeare. And I got this
                book. I was in an Irish Catholic boarding school in North India
                and I read it like it was not allowed or something. I don’t
                remember why that was. I suppose it was what grown ups read,
                more grown up than 16. I think it was the role of Becky, the
                character of Becky. For me she was a completely modern character
                and totally timeless. And I guess I identified with the fact
                that she was on the outside of society and I know that society,
                cause if anyone understands class and hierarchy better than the
                English it’s the Indians. We really have got that down and so
                to climb into that straight jacketed society as in England at
                that time, it took a lot of mettle; it took a lot of guts. I
                think it was that, that kept me. But also I love Thackeray. I
                loved his point of view on this world, even back when I was 16.
                He was born and raised in Calcutta. And in fact I used to cross
                his decaying bungalow everyday when I used to walk to school.
                Anyway I loved his point of view. He was very clear eyed about
                the hypocrisy of his own society and I also really loved the way
                he dealt with the relationships between the colonies and the
                empire because that was the milieu of the Vanity Fair that he
                wrote about. This milieu where for the first time England was
                feeling the flush of wealth from the realm of colonies. And that
                was what was creating this middle class of Osbornes who had the
                money for the first time as much as the aristocracy but did not
                have the status. And I loved the satiric but affectionate way
                that Thackeray cut through all this. And I think partly maybe
                because he was also an outsider just like Becky because he
                didn’t come from there. He was a colony kid who was sent back
                to become an Englishman and maybe that made him look at his
                society clearly. It is an elegant banquet of a novel almost like
                a soap opera. He wrote it like a page turner and it still is a
                page turner.
 
 On the biggest challenge paring down the book to make the
                film…
 My biggest challenge was doing justice to the novel. It really
                helped that I knew it so well; it was not a job I got. My first
                choice to adapt the novel with me was Julian Fellows who had
                just won the Oscar for Gosford Park, who unknown to me was an
                equally helpless fan of Thackeray and knew this novel. I just
                constructed this map of life that I do when I start any of my
                films. You know a map of life meaning what I would like to have
                included in the movie and what I really wanted was not just to
                make it a star vehicle bit I wanted to make it a film about the
                democratic sort of swirl of the world that Thackeray wrote
                about. That every character would be important even the dog
                would have history in a way. And Julian and I saw eye to eye on
                this and within three months we had a screenplay. But if I have
                a sensibility at all it is to amplify the frame and to make it
                as dense as possible with detail and with action and so with
                anything that I loved in the novel, but didn’t have a whole
                scene for, I either created a scene for or jammed it in. And
                what I loved about Thackeray and how I see the world is that
                there is no villain. Each one of us has this gray area. And
                actually I don’t have any regrets of what I couldn’t put in.
 
 On why there are such few women directors…
 I can only speak for myself. But the route I follow is to follow
                my own heart and to create my own kind of work and I have been
                privileged enough that my work has found an audience abroad as
                well as in this country. So when Hollywood comes calling to me
                or when other people come to me, they come to me for my
                sensibility. I think the trouble is when women or men want to
                get on to that A-list or B-list, usually Hollywood being
                male-centric would offer a teen comedy or a coming-of-age girlie
                movie to a woman director. That hasn’t happened to me or I
                don’t do such films. My criterion is if I can think of one
                other person to do this movie than I won’t. Why me then? It
                has to be special to me. I can’t really speak for why there
                are few women directors. But I think if you want to join a
                system like Hollywood which is so monolithic and massive then
                you have to be subsumed by that system, but I come to that
                system by being alternative to that system and being asked by
                that system.
 
 On why it’s important for her to do films like Monsoon
                Wedding and Salaam Bombay in the midst of Hollywood movies…
 As much as I like to do versatile things; I also feel
                increasingly now that we have so much of American culture on
                screen all over the world and I need to help in at least
                correcting or addressing that balance in some way. I come from a
                culture and a country that has extraordinarily explosive cinema
                and again I’m alternative to Bollywood and that system. But
                there is enormous validation in showing oneself or people who
                look like us on screen. And if we don’t tell our own stories
                no one else will tell them for us.
 |